OP ED
By Don Amador
Date: Oct. 8, 2015
Word Count: 209
*Permission to reprint is hereby granted
THE NATIONAL
MONUMENT EXPRESS HAS LEFT THE STATION
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) dueling plans in
Southern California to have Congress pass legislation that includes Wilderness
designations and statutory protection for 5 OHV areas vs. having the President
designate 1 million acres as a National Monument sans the OHV component is a
good example of a new land-use paradigm called the National Monument Express.
Having watched the National Monument process in various
states over the last few years, it is my observation the environmental movement
has created an “either/or” strategy to use the very real threat of a National
Monument designation should Congress not act on a proposal.
It appears that in many cases, comprehensive land-use
bills that include both Wilderness designations and OHV protections are not
moving through Congress. The reality is
that when these collaborative bills get stalled in Congress, the proponents ask
the President to designate them as a National Monument.
Given the historic paradigm where GOP presidents will not
rescind prior National Monument designations nor use the Act to designate
pro-access National Monuments, the local user groups are left in a very
precarious position where they must try and make lemonade out of political
lemons.
# # #
Don Amador writes on land-use and
environmental policy issues from his office in Oakley, CA. He is president of Quiet Warrior
Racing/Consulting and also works as a contractor to the BlueRibbon
Coalition. He may be reached via email
at: damador@cwo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment