Thursday, July 13, 2017

SB 249 Hearing Update with Video of Hearing - Must See OHV TV

OHV Supporters Line Up to Speak in in Favor of the Currrent OHV Program
and in Opposition to SB249

SB 249 Hearing Update (Video of Hearing) – Many OHVers have heard the term to describe the ugly process of legislation as “sausage-making.”  The following 45 min. video (thanks to our OHV lobby team for making this video available!) gives the general OHV community a good peek into the dark work of land-use politics.  Having been engaged in land use politics for the past 27 years at the state and federal level, this video (OHV starts at 50:20) starting with SB249 sponsor, Senator Ben Allen, illustrates the political spin of trying to cast the bill as a pro-OHV bill that simply wants to basically reauthorize the current OHV program by adding just a few simple amendments.

LINK to SB249 on my FB Page

After Sen. Allen’s presentation you will find environmental representatives that make false declarative statements against the OHV program and by inference … Division staff.

At 1:03:23, you will listen to OHV lobbyist, Terry McHale, strongly defend the current OHV program and highlight SB249’s fatal flaws.  He highlights the fact that the program is a National Model and that SB249 was created in a vacuum without input from OHV.  Terry also points out that SB249 places unreasonable environmental standards on SVRAs (which may even extend to other “units” of the system which include FS/BLM/County riding areas). He is a good friend of OHV and one of our best advocates in Sacto. 

At 1:08:45, I highlight my concerns about the legal mine field laid by SB249 and the fiscal impacts it would have on the program… if the program continues at all in a SB 249-based program.  I also join Terry in making a commitment to work with Sen. Allen and the proponents in a bipartisan manner to address remaining issues and concerns.

At 1:11, a representative for rural farm workers stated his opposition to SB249 because of the potential impacts to the OHV grants program.

At 1:13, you will see various pro-OHV representatives from rural counties, OHV industry, OHV clubs, and others speak in opposition to SB249.  Am very proud of the OHV Coalition!

At 1:16, the vice chair (a rural legislator and OHVer) restates the fact the SB249 had no real stakeholder engagement and that the bill could impact OHV areas in his district and also impact motorized access to non-motorized recreation.  Other legislators weighed in as well.

Maybe the most important thing at the hearing happened at the end when Sen. Allen made a commitment to “work” in a more substantive manner with rural legislators and OHV representatives to resolve issues.   The bill did pass with an 8-5 vote, but that vote was based on future meetings with affected parties to resolve issues.  This battle is far from over.  Thanks for taking time to watch this video!


2 comments:

  1. All OHV Riders & D36 members. I STRONGLY suggest you take the time to view how "sausage" is made in our State Capitol. Don has done a good job of identifying the key times to skip over prior Agenda Items, and time marked critical parts so you can fast forward to the OHV portions of SB 249. This is a Committee Hearing so you can actually see the Committee Members, and anti OHV folks, and the OPPOSE folks from OHV organizations. This will give you some insight on the process. Our KEY Speaker is Terry McHale, from Aaron Read & Associates. He knocks it out of the park.... ARA is funded by D36, Cal4WD Assoc., D37 and ORBA as partners. This is where some our LAO money is spent. RIGHTS+RIDING+RACING
    BIG kudos to Don Amador for putting this together for us to view. It took a lot of time and effort. Thanks DON!
    Dave Pickett D36 LAO Director

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice Don. Strong, concise presentation. I was happily surprised to see the (UFW?) rep in opposition too. Terry was not subtle either. Riverside County's opposition was nice (aren't they the county that proscribed riding on your own property?).
    Keep up the good fight.

    ReplyDelete