tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-853780194331041713.post506427491468744504..comments2023-10-21T02:16:31.691-07:00Comments on The General's Recreation HQ: Green Lust For Closures Exposed in new Subpart A Lawsuit filed in CODon Amadorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13045787382896008473noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-853780194331041713.post-34377463038781028072011-02-01T16:53:35.904-08:002011-02-01T16:53:35.904-08:00Aaron, Just cause I was born in Humboldt County d...Aaron, Just cause I was born in Humboldt County does not mean I am stupid. The code word for these new "Subpart A" lawsuits is TMR "minimization criteria" - which has always been around and that Forests have used to judge the roads and trails they need to meet Forest Plan and public needs. Those code words on found on page 27 of the complaint. Now, greens want a court to step in and make those decisions. Nice try Aaron.Don Amadorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13045787382896008473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-853780194331041713.post-76245296177516194332011-02-01T15:18:16.169-08:002011-02-01T15:18:16.169-08:00Nice try Don, but the CO Forest in question alread...Nice try Don, but the CO Forest in question already had a designated OHV system (albeit poorly managed) so they didn't need to do a TMP and follow Subpart A just yet...that will come later. They simply needed to publish their MVUMs...but did so by adding in hundreds of miles that were existing but had never been designated as open to the public....that is illegal. the lawsuit is for just that. I imagine you would be just as upset had the FS used the MVUM to close hundreds of miles of designated (not user created) OHV routes by simply leaving them off the MVUM without ever conducting a process. Well, they can't just add them either. Greens didn't fus sover the designated routes they don't like...this was purely a technical excercise and they are calling the FS out for the illegal action.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00555824219883383201noreply@blogger.com